Comments on: Spotlight PyCon-Tech: CacheMgr http://www.dougma.com/archives/55 the truth according to Doug Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:21:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-bleeding By: doug http://www.dougma.com/archives/55#comment-66 doug Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:34:59 +0000 http://www.dougma.com/archives/51#comment-66 Kent, Yea, that was what I was hinting at when I said <i>'memcached will take a bit more work'</i>. I have not found a good solution to a number of memcached issues. It might require comming up with a new memcached backend implementation which caches the keys in a localmem fashion, and have the cachemgr do full page bulk gets. Granted this means that base memcached will still not be supported. Kent,

Yea, that was what I was hinting at when I said ‘memcached will take a bit more work’. I have not found a good solution to a number of memcached issues. It might require comming up with a new memcached backend implementation which caches the keys in a localmem fashion, and have the cachemgr do full page bulk gets. Granted this means that base memcached will still not be supported.

]]> By: Kent Johnson http://www.dougma.com/archives/55#comment-65 Kent Johnson Sun, 18 Nov 2007 13:27:59 +0000 http://www.dougma.com/archives/51#comment-65 IIUC this will be difficult to implement for memcached, which does not have an API call to list the keys in the cache. The FAQ says this would kill performance: http://www.socialtext.net/memcached/index.cgi?faq#can_i_iterate_the_items_of_the_memcached_server IIUC this will be difficult to implement for memcached, which does not have an API call to list the keys in the cache. The FAQ says this would kill performance:
http://www.socialtext.net/memcached/index.cgi?faq#can_i_iterate_the_items_of_the_memcached_server

]]>